DWCon 2008: The Joy Of Panel Games
Aug. 27th, 2008 11:16 pm“I’m Sorry, I Haven’t a Clue What You’re Talking About”
or
The Joy of Panel Games
One of the many, many worrying things about a DW con is that, if you walk up to someone at random and say “Elephant and Castle”, chances are they’ll say “Baker Street” (because we all know about the 1973 northwards Bakerloo Prohibition, of course). A discussion will then ensue about the validity of that prohibition
Anyway, the point is that chances are people will know what you’re talking about. There’s also an above-average chance that they’ll be able to play any panel game you care to mention, and play it passably well.
And so it was that a hodgepodge of panel games, Have I Got A Nac Mac Feegle For You, found its way into the main programme on the very first day; hosted by the one and only Davina, this pitted Bernard Pearson and - was it Pat "Quack" Harkin? - against each other in a clash of titans, each assisted by mildly flummoxed crosspondian assistants. The battle opened with a volley of Just A Minute, where Bernard’s knack for the spoken word was somewhat hampered by his tendency to forget to hit the bell. Things got silly after that, but I can't remember exactly what games they were...
At that point the battle was interrupted by a surprise cavalry charge of the 4th Mornington Crescent Hussars, where the cunning use of the Westwards McMillan Gambit caused the competitors some confusion. But the sneak attack was soon repelled, and the combatants closed to Swannee Kazoo range for a fierce round of tongue-to-tongue fighting[2].
After all that, I can’t remember now who won. Either way, I’d come prepared with bells and stopwatch, so it was the final straw that set me off, and thenceforth I became a sort of panel game Godzilla, buttonholing[3] people at random and ensnaring them into impromptu games, whether they’d heard of them or not.
But it didn’t stop there, oh no. After all, Diane Duane and Peter Morwood had been forced to cancel, so their two two-hour slots left the Cavern free. A quick visit to programming, and an inter-guild Just A Minute tournament had been scheduled.
In retrospect, I should probably have thought to make a note of the competitors’ names, but you can’t win ‘em all. But the topics covered such diverse subjects as “How to Find a Man in a Hat,” “The Joy of Velcro,” and “Why Bacon Is Good”. The Witches made a valiant attempt at The Relevance Of Bees, but despite a fairly interesting debate on the various species of hymenoptera[4] they ended up second to last with five points, beating off only the seamstresses with their two. The guild of Small Gods fared slightly better, finishing with thirteen points at the end of the hour, but from early on it was clear that the true battle was between Judith[5] for the Teachers and Davina for the Conjurers. Eventually, with the Teachers finishing on an impressive 24 points, the Conjurers only just snuck into the lead, winning the game with 26.
Oh, and we also established that I am a god, but not a small one.[6]
After that I filled my weekend with impromptu games, culminating in the phenomenally, terrifyingly ferocious midnight battle of Post-Watershed Just A Minute in the bar. And the Earth shook, mountains fell, Mary Whitehouse found herself beyond censor range, and so on.
There were other guild reps present, of course; a steady stream of witches, wizards, and small gods sat their stint at the table, but once more a duel to the innuendo[7] emerged early on. Unsurprisingly, Davina once more kept his end up, though Conina kept him on the defensive, pounding at every chance with a variety of ferocious challenges. While the representative from Small Gods handled Vestal Virgins, the Witch rep spent 25 seconds on The Lovely Samantha, but ultimately Conina – with her intriguing explanation of Broomsticks And Their Uses[8] – drew level with Davina, finishing in a joint first place with a phenomenal 31 points each. Against Davina, that’s got to count as a victory.
That was the end of the more-or-less official games, but naturally more cropped up. Perhaps most memorably, at one in the morning following the always slightly sad Dead Monkey Party.
There I was, sitting in the bar, chatting amiably to Cat, Rgemini, a couple of delightfully evil Irish sisters whose name tags I really should have tried to read at some point[9], Sabremeister, and Probably Alex[10]. Then, suddenly, those fateful words were uttered.
“Baker Street.”
That kicked it off, of course. Three of us knew the game; the others didn’t, and made a valiant effort, but not knowing the London Underground left them without a chance. So, to give them a fair fight[11], we settled on European Rules, assigning The Hague as the destination. They still seemed rather confused, but nevertheless the Hibernian contingent managed a number of shrewd moves. In particular, a move to Dubrovnic left Rgemini in a very difficult spot, which he only just managed to sneak out of.
Then we moved on to that game where you utter words that mustn’t be connected to the word before it. My memories of that game are pretty blurry, but I do remember that one of the Irish sisters – Nicola, if my memory serves, which is never certain – mentioned the name of their old school. So when Mary-Ellen (probably) followed it with something else – I can’t remember what now – I challenged on the grounds that anything she said was spoken by someone who had attended that school. Evil, perhaps, but she had helped[12] with the ultra-evil version of Walk The Walk.
Oh, and the winner of that game? Nicola. A novice, and she thrashed all of us once we got to the Sudden Death round.
I love panel games.
(Oh, and for anyone who thinks an ISIHAC con – I’m Sorry, I Haven’t A Con – would be fun, give me or Davina a yell. It’s the antidote to fan cons.)
[1] As you will recall, naturally, it was enacted by the then non-quorate MCA, and is thus considered non-standard by many purists.
[2] Oh god, I wish I hadn’t spent so much time talking to seamstresses this weekend...
[3] “Buttonholing” is a good word. Make a note, Darling; I like it, and want to use it more in conversation.
[4] I knew my Wikipedia addiction would come in handy.
[5] Probably. You know what my memory’s like. I may well have muddled things.
[6] Bloody seamstresses. Pass the brain bleach.
[7] I am required by law at this point to deploy the traditional “in whose end?” joke. That was it.
[8]“Flagellation”, apparently.
[9] Now that I’ve got home and had an uninterrupted 14 hours’ sleep, I’m pretty sure they were Nicola and Mary-Ellen. I’m even pretty sure I’ve pinned the right name on the right sister.
[10] Sorry about that, by the way. In my defence, it was one AM and my memory’s terrible at the best of times. One AM isn’t the best of times. On the up side, Cat had her face painted as a cat, and “CAT” on her forehead. At one in the morning, this was helpful.
[11] Within reason, of course. We hadn’t explained the rules to them at that point.
[12] Well, I say “helped”. “Co-conspired” would probably be more apt.